Ah, The Social Network. The best movie I merely tolerated this year, and the most overrated movie to win an Oscar for Best Picture since…well, it hasn’t won yet. But it will. And when it does, my disappointment in the Academy will be perfected.
Don’t misunderstand, The Social Network is a great film. Directed by Oscar-winner David Fincher and boasting a talented young cast (with the exception of Timberlake), the movie is well-directed, well-written, and well-acted. On paper, it’s as close to a perfect film as one could hope to see. But does it deserve the golden statue? I don’t think so. Here's why...
1. The whole is less than the sum of its parts. Let me explain. No, there is nothing wrong with the film’s direction, acting, or dialogue. The script is sharp, the cinematography top-notch, and the music phenomenal. But the film as a whole is nothing to write home about. At the end of the day (er…the movie), you walk out of the theater asking, “Who cares?” Because while there is nothing wrong with the film, that does not mean that everything is right. In the end, we are given a less-than-compelling story that is both melodramatic and largely fictional. It’s like hiring a world-class chef, handing him cookware and appliances of the highest quality, then asking him to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Sure, it’ll be one tasty PBJ. But what’s the point?
2. The film is riding the buzz to victory. Back in October, just before The Social Network was released, it became the source of incredible hype. “The Facebook movie” was a hit before it ever sold a ticket. I'm not saying hype is inherently bad. Take Inception, for example. It was hyped for months, it matched the hype, and both audiences and critics decided it was worthy of their praise. But The Social Network is a different animal. Based (loosely) on true events, the film is a dramatic character study, and one that deals with timely subject matter. In other words, it’s a film that was tailor-made for Oscar contention. It was hyped, fell somewhat short of the hype, and yet was still referred to as the “movie of the year”. Why? Because, as I mentioned before, nobody could find anything wrong with it. So it maintained it’s “movie of the year” status in the minds of critics and moviegoers, and will continue to ride that wave all the way to Oscar night. Seem fair? Not really. Especially when there are so many other films that are just as worthy, if not more so. Which brings us to…
3. The Academy promised us it wouldn’t. Well, it’s not like they pinky promised. But when they expanded the Best Picture category from five slots to ten, they strongly implied things would change. You see, the purpose of expanding the category was to give a wider array of films a chance for Oscar glory. The problem with five slots became glaringly obvious a couple years ago, when a little film called The Dark Knight was snubbed for a Best Picture nomination. The movie that likely took its place, The Reader, was seen by almost no one and—more importantly—was never seriously being considered for an Oscar. But The Reader was the type of film the Academy would take seriously, so it garnered a spot. And The Dark Knight, easily one of the most entertaining movies of the year, was not even given a chance to compete.
For this reason and others, the Academy recognized the problem and doubled the number of Best Picture slots. Problem solved, right? Not exactly. It's already apparent that the increase in nominations has not changed the Academy’s mindset at all. Because while there are now ten films to choose from when voting for Best Picture, there are still only three or four that are being seriously considered. Which means there might as well be only five slots. Back to square one.
So what will it mean if The Social Network wins? Just that the movies we enjoyed the most this year (like Toy Story 3, Inception, and The King's Speech) will go unrecognized. And while that may not matter to most casual moviegoers, you can bet that it matters to those who worked so hard to make exciting, original cinema. And it should matter to the Academy, whose job it is to reward the year’s most entertaining films. If it is incapable of performing its one and only duty, then we might as well skip Oscar night and go see a screening of No Strings Attached starring Ashton Kutcher. The Academy can still throw their party, showering praise upon its Hollywood darlings, drinking martinis and insisting upon themselves. We don’t care. They could even change their name to "The Academy of Pretentious Criteria for Films not Movies".
Of course, they’ll have to update their facebook page.
G
G

